I've been dating my BF for a few eyars now but- recently broke up. Every time i want to have sex- i take a shower and fall asleep to fight the anxiety. I'm a bit scared about catching something from someone else that's why i won't get out there and look for someone. Some times- it's so bad because i sit at home and watch porn and masturbate. I'm a girl and that's normal for a guy to do but- i find mysielf doing so and feel guilty afterwards. My former BF and i broke up 2 months ago but we still talk and hang out. There's been a couple of occasions when we make love but- i feel bad after because we're not together anymore and I feel used by him and as if i'm using him too. I've never caught an STD and neither has he and i think that's why he looks for me istead of anyone else when he wants sex.But- 90% of the time I initiate it. He loves that about me. I'm up for it at amay time anywhere and at the same time when we fight-he uses it against me %26amp; calls me a whore. Is that normal?
Is there suck as things as being addicted to sex?
Yes, there is in fact people who are addicted to sex. But are you one of them? What I know is that when it is an addiction, it really affects you, making it impossible to have a normal life, sleeping with complete strangers, putting at risk your health, etc. It doesn't sound like your behavior though... You can be very interested in sex, but it only becomes a problem when you can't control it and you can't lead a normal life...
Reply:it's called lust,
Reply:If you are a man and can't control it then society laughs at you when you screw an ugly or fat chick.
If you are a woman who can't control it and screw lots of other guys you are a slut. Accept it. However if you choose to sleep with other women to satisfy your needs that is perfectly acceptable and you would not be a slut.
Reply:there is such a thing i have the same problems as you im also affraid of catching something, i was also in a long term relationship. if you ever have an erge to im here and willing. contact me leglover111@yahoo.com
Reply:yeah your normal but as for going back to him just for sex and not wanting to meet someone who would treat you better i have to say is stupid
Reply:stay away from him, and email me. we can be sex buddies, I can show you my medical report that states i'm clean.
Reply:you are not addicted to sex u are as normal as anyone else.
Reply:It is just fine . It just means you have a high sex drive . Some women give birth %26amp; loose that %26amp; some women get worse as they hit their 30's . All woman handle sex different. I will say that's smart thinking in being selective on going out %26amp; sleeping just with anyone.You guys keep on having sex with each other if no one feels offended cause you probably get along better this way. As far as him calling you a whore He must really like what you give if he keeps coming back. Don't let it bother you.
Reply:wow u r having a real big dilemna
well u need to be strong
why dont u get back with him?
it seems like u two love each other
work things out
Reply:Yes, sex addiction is very real, but it sounds like you're just horny. If you were a real addict, you'd be out there getting some and wouldn't care so much as to where it's coming from. Some girls get more horny than other girls, just like some guys get more horny than other guy. There's absolutely nothing wrong with masturbating! It's very healthy to release that anxiety. You'll sleep a lot better after you get yourself off. And if your not in a relationship, then more power to you because you can masturbate to multiple guys in your fantasy. From what you described, you are FAR from a whore. You ex just says that to get to you. He's your ex, he knows what buttons to push to upset you. If he keeps it up, it's time to ditch him and go shopping for toys at the porn store.
Reply:I may very well be normal (I don't always pay attention to such things), but what's "normal" and what's RIGHT do not often coincide. Best not to confuse the two, for it's what's right that matters.
Reply:After breaking up, sex is one of the hardest things to let go.
Reply:Absolutley, Its called Nymphomania. I have it, and "ADIDAS"
Reply:YES...................................
Reply:there is such a thing... if you think you have a problem then see a psychologist.
However, it is perfectly normal to have a high sex drive. It is also normal for you to watch porn. It is also normal for you to masturbate. The media and the way we're raised in this country makes us think, as women, that sex is dirty. It isn't. It's perfectly natural and don't you let him call you a whore. THAT is where the guilty feelings come in from. It's society judgement upon us. I got called a whore when I was 7 because a boy kissed me. It traumatized me until high school. That person was a coward and jealous...
Bottom line: think for yourself. be happy with yourself. as long as you can go home look at yourself in the mirror and be happy with what you've done and are doing as a whole, then you'll be ok.
Reply:You can't live your life wrapped up in fear! Go out and find yourself a friend with benefits!
Reply:once I turned 30 i couldn't get enough. It is really hard on us because we are taught it is not normal. Just think of it as a guy who is 16 they can not get enough either. Your not out there getting sex from everyone and your thinking safely.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Real Murder Mystery, can you help?
My brother died in his sleep at the age of 7, nearly 30 years ago. no cause of death was ever found. There were 2 autopsies done, but one autopsy report 'dissapeared' never to be seen or heard from again. the 2nd report which i got from the cemetary- isnt even half complete. I have taken the report to several doctors over the eyars and they have all said the same thing- its a bogus report. half the stuff they are supposed to do they never did. the cause of death was listed as "adnel virus 7" well that means " a sinus cold" which, i might add, you dont die from. Plus, he was at the end of his cold. ( you can die from pneumonia etc but not a sinus cold) no legitimate cause of death was ever found and for nearly 30 years we have all wondered why. Are there any docs or med ppl out there who can help me find out what really happend? We live in Canada, dont know if that matters or not. 7 year old boys just dont die in thier sleep for no reason.
Real Murder Mystery, can you help?
wow that's really tough. If he was beaten, there would of been signs, of bruises, etc...was he on the medication of hydrocodon for the sinus infection?
could he of been suffocated...? Only signs of that would of been lack of oxygen to his brain...which would of been a good reason why they said it was the sinus cold that did it. And most of the organs would of probably went at the same time that way...although I'm no expert, and that's just my educated guess...I am so sorry for your loss...I know how the *not knowing* can eat at you.
Reply:I am no doctor, but if this sinus infection went into his lungs or he had asthma, he could have died from suffocation due to pulmonary distress. I know that wasn't in the coroners report, but a possible lead.
Reply:yes, they can die in there sleep for no reason. maube god decided it was time to go to heaven. maybe he wasnt meant to be on this earth for more than 7 years?...... oh well..... hopefully when YOU get to heaven youll see him again. :)
Reply:i'm not a dr but without more information no doctor could possibly tell you, you need to find someone that is willing to investigate this. do you have a theory?
Reply:Unless there is a chance you can talk to the person who did one of the original autopsies, (although after 30 years they might be dead themselves) or you have the skeleton exhumed (assuming he was buried) and find some sort of damage to the bones that would indicate foul play, it will be very, very difficult to uncover any evidence at this point.
There's always a chance that your brother may have sufficated while sleeping. If his mouth was obstructed and his nose was stuffy from the sinus cold, it's possible.
I'm sorry for your loss, and I hope someone can tell you something that puts your mind at peace. Good luck.
Reply:You can die from a sinus cold. Especially if he was very sickly. Especially if he's in Canada -- fighting of a sickness in the winter would be a very hard thing to do.
There's no real reason for them to make a bogus report besides being lazy and overworked. They weren't out to murder your brother or probably cover anything up. It's not like he's a millionaire or a celebrity.
This might not be the answer you're looking for. But no one can ever bring him back, and things can't be the way they were. Sometimes people die at early ages to prevent them from living lives of suffering. Sometimes people have done all the good that was required from them during that life.
I'm sorry that your life was touched by death, and that he died so young.
Death is just another beginning.
Reply:go to slivabrown.com she has helped meny people.... Trust me she is right on about EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply:First of all let me say how DEEPLY sorry I am for your loss. Death, no matter what age, or circumstances, or how ever much time has passed is extremely difficult to go through. I lost my younger sister just 6 months ago. She died in her sleep as well. She died of something she had never had before, so it is posssible for things like that to just happen. We can't change what happened, all we can do is go on with our lives, but if you believe that something really fowl did happen you could always hire a private investigator to look into it. I will pray for your grief, and give you the comfort that you will see your brother again someday! He's in heaven with my sister! God bless you and your journey!
Real Murder Mystery, can you help?
wow that's really tough. If he was beaten, there would of been signs, of bruises, etc...was he on the medication of hydrocodon for the sinus infection?
could he of been suffocated...? Only signs of that would of been lack of oxygen to his brain...which would of been a good reason why they said it was the sinus cold that did it. And most of the organs would of probably went at the same time that way...although I'm no expert, and that's just my educated guess...I am so sorry for your loss...I know how the *not knowing* can eat at you.
Reply:I am no doctor, but if this sinus infection went into his lungs or he had asthma, he could have died from suffocation due to pulmonary distress. I know that wasn't in the coroners report, but a possible lead.
Reply:yes, they can die in there sleep for no reason. maube god decided it was time to go to heaven. maybe he wasnt meant to be on this earth for more than 7 years?...... oh well..... hopefully when YOU get to heaven youll see him again. :)
Reply:i'm not a dr but without more information no doctor could possibly tell you, you need to find someone that is willing to investigate this. do you have a theory?
Reply:Unless there is a chance you can talk to the person who did one of the original autopsies, (although after 30 years they might be dead themselves) or you have the skeleton exhumed (assuming he was buried) and find some sort of damage to the bones that would indicate foul play, it will be very, very difficult to uncover any evidence at this point.
There's always a chance that your brother may have sufficated while sleeping. If his mouth was obstructed and his nose was stuffy from the sinus cold, it's possible.
I'm sorry for your loss, and I hope someone can tell you something that puts your mind at peace. Good luck.
Reply:You can die from a sinus cold. Especially if he was very sickly. Especially if he's in Canada -- fighting of a sickness in the winter would be a very hard thing to do.
There's no real reason for them to make a bogus report besides being lazy and overworked. They weren't out to murder your brother or probably cover anything up. It's not like he's a millionaire or a celebrity.
This might not be the answer you're looking for. But no one can ever bring him back, and things can't be the way they were. Sometimes people die at early ages to prevent them from living lives of suffering. Sometimes people have done all the good that was required from them during that life.
I'm sorry that your life was touched by death, and that he died so young.
Death is just another beginning.
Reply:go to slivabrown.com she has helped meny people.... Trust me she is right on about EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply:First of all let me say how DEEPLY sorry I am for your loss. Death, no matter what age, or circumstances, or how ever much time has passed is extremely difficult to go through. I lost my younger sister just 6 months ago. She died in her sleep as well. She died of something she had never had before, so it is posssible for things like that to just happen. We can't change what happened, all we can do is go on with our lives, but if you believe that something really fowl did happen you could always hire a private investigator to look into it. I will pray for your grief, and give you the comfort that you will see your brother again someday! He's in heaven with my sister! God bless you and your journey!
Help..i am really upset?
my mom is on a "diet." She was eating about 3 scoops of ice cream tonight with chocolate syrup and bananas. She said "it's the only junk food I had today" and "I am doing the right thing for now, trust me" but she makes me cry. i always hear her complain about her weight, and it hurts me to see her eat that much in one time. She even made me cry. even though she did say" i am doing the right thing for now" and she told me "I don't understand." I am fourteen eyars old and really worried about my mother. what should I do? she doesn't want me talking about it with her.
Help..i am really upset?
i'm sure it's a sensitive subject, and a complex one
you are doing the right thing by letting her know you are concerned for her health... other things you might do to help, invite her to do things with you that are physical, something not too hard... maybe go for a walk and talk (about other things, not her diet)
the truth is, she will need to decide within herself that she wants better health
i know this because i worked as a consultant for jenny craig for a year and a half
Reply:Instead of telling her that she shouldn't do it, start the conversation by saying, there is something that I would like to talk to you about that makes me very sad. I even cried. Then she may sit down wondering what it is. Then talk to her about how it makes you very sad to see any one you love hurt and sad and displeased with who they are. Tell her that you really want her to be happy with herself so that you can be happy with yourself. Maybe you could go shopping with her and pick out fruits and vegetables you like and tell her how YOU don't like the ice cream so you shouldn't get it.. Help her by exercising with her and then once she likes who she is becoming, buy a small bag of cookies for you to share with her. Then she is limited to sweets when they are not bought. I'm sorry if this doesn't help
Reply:You should tell her that if her 14 year old daughter knows something is wrong with her mother's dietary habits then it actually means that something is so wrong a child can see it and that she should start being a role model and eating healthy foods and choosing better snacks for herself. You do not want her to die of heart disease which is what those foods will cause. Heart disease is the leading cause of death among women in America.
Reply:Get her a scale and record how much she is gaining instead of losing, and give her advice, suggest she eat a cup of pop-corn or a salad with lime juice. If she wants something sweet, cut up some fruit squeeze some lime on it. Keep an eye on what she eats and bug her about it, this will help her remember she IS on a diet. You are a smart girl to know that what she is doing is not right, she is cheating and this will ultimately hurt her. Encouage her to exercise, even if you have to walk around the football field with her, it will give you time to talk and get close to her, so that she doesn't get mad at you for giving her advice. Sometimes children say things that make a difference in a parent's life, good luck.
Reply:is she obese? Maybe she allows herself to cheat once in a while. If ur really upset about it, maybe you should hide/throw away any junk food in the house.
Reply:*hugs* I know how hard it is. This is ultimately in her hands even though it hurts you. You will need to explain this to her at some point when the mood is right. If your push it on her she will be likely to push back. You should check into the the show "The Biggest Loser". It sounds like she really needs a life changing experience.
Reply:switch her ice cream to the fat free one
Reply:If you can't directly make an impact, maybe tell one of her siblings or one of her really good friends that CAN make an impact. I'm sure it's disappointing that you can't help your mother, but trying and putting in an effort is enough to make you feel good. Keep trying, you can do it!
Reply:try posting some good nutritional diagrams, charts, and pictures to give your mom some physicial simulation. hopefully that will help her eat better. maybe you can create a menu for her to follow for each meal. like a list of foods that she can have during breakfast, lunch, snack and dinner. you can also try to start small to like help her quite soda or junk food all together.
keep it up, there is nothing wrong with a helpful disagreement between love ones. good luck.
Reply:You see darling, the best way to make your mom realize how worried you are is by not telling her anything. something like revese psychology. you can show her by means other than telling her. soon or later she will realize how much is she hurting you by over eating.
rotten teeth
Help..i am really upset?
i'm sure it's a sensitive subject, and a complex one
you are doing the right thing by letting her know you are concerned for her health... other things you might do to help, invite her to do things with you that are physical, something not too hard... maybe go for a walk and talk (about other things, not her diet)
the truth is, she will need to decide within herself that she wants better health
i know this because i worked as a consultant for jenny craig for a year and a half
Reply:Instead of telling her that she shouldn't do it, start the conversation by saying, there is something that I would like to talk to you about that makes me very sad. I even cried. Then she may sit down wondering what it is. Then talk to her about how it makes you very sad to see any one you love hurt and sad and displeased with who they are. Tell her that you really want her to be happy with herself so that you can be happy with yourself. Maybe you could go shopping with her and pick out fruits and vegetables you like and tell her how YOU don't like the ice cream so you shouldn't get it.. Help her by exercising with her and then once she likes who she is becoming, buy a small bag of cookies for you to share with her. Then she is limited to sweets when they are not bought. I'm sorry if this doesn't help
Reply:You should tell her that if her 14 year old daughter knows something is wrong with her mother's dietary habits then it actually means that something is so wrong a child can see it and that she should start being a role model and eating healthy foods and choosing better snacks for herself. You do not want her to die of heart disease which is what those foods will cause. Heart disease is the leading cause of death among women in America.
Reply:Get her a scale and record how much she is gaining instead of losing, and give her advice, suggest she eat a cup of pop-corn or a salad with lime juice. If she wants something sweet, cut up some fruit squeeze some lime on it. Keep an eye on what she eats and bug her about it, this will help her remember she IS on a diet. You are a smart girl to know that what she is doing is not right, she is cheating and this will ultimately hurt her. Encouage her to exercise, even if you have to walk around the football field with her, it will give you time to talk and get close to her, so that she doesn't get mad at you for giving her advice. Sometimes children say things that make a difference in a parent's life, good luck.
Reply:is she obese? Maybe she allows herself to cheat once in a while. If ur really upset about it, maybe you should hide/throw away any junk food in the house.
Reply:*hugs* I know how hard it is. This is ultimately in her hands even though it hurts you. You will need to explain this to her at some point when the mood is right. If your push it on her she will be likely to push back. You should check into the the show "The Biggest Loser". It sounds like she really needs a life changing experience.
Reply:switch her ice cream to the fat free one
Reply:If you can't directly make an impact, maybe tell one of her siblings or one of her really good friends that CAN make an impact. I'm sure it's disappointing that you can't help your mother, but trying and putting in an effort is enough to make you feel good. Keep trying, you can do it!
Reply:try posting some good nutritional diagrams, charts, and pictures to give your mom some physicial simulation. hopefully that will help her eat better. maybe you can create a menu for her to follow for each meal. like a list of foods that she can have during breakfast, lunch, snack and dinner. you can also try to start small to like help her quite soda or junk food all together.
keep it up, there is nothing wrong with a helpful disagreement between love ones. good luck.
Reply:You see darling, the best way to make your mom realize how worried you are is by not telling her anything. something like revese psychology. you can show her by means other than telling her. soon or later she will realize how much is she hurting you by over eating.
rotten teeth
Nurse or Vet Nurse?
Should i become a vet nurse/assistant or a people nurse?
Which gets paid better?
and how many eyars do i have to be in college for a people nurse and a vet nurse?
which do you think is better?
Nurse or Vet Nurse?
1) Should i become a vet nurse/assistant or a people nurse? Only you can answer this question for yourself since this is what you will be doing for a living. It really comes down to whether you rather deal with humans or pets.
2) Which gets paid better?
Human nurse! Hands down!
3) and how many eyars do i have to be in college for a people nurse and a vet nurse?
Human nurses can graduate in 4-5 years. Veterinarian technicians sometimes have no schooling, sometimes have a 2 year degree, and sometimes have a 4+ year degree. Greatly depends on your location and the vet office that hires you.
4) which do you think is better?
I am not the best person to ask this question to because I am biased! I absolutely LOVE what I do. I sometimes think I need to be pinched at work because I love my job that much. Like all professions, there are good days and there are bad days. My passion is animals, so this is the perfect career for me.
Reply:People nurses get paid a LOT better in most all cases. BUT, more exposure to diseases that YOU can get!!!!!!!
And personally, I like sticking animals with needles a lot more than I would like sticking people with them!!!!
There MAY still be some two year schools for Vet Tech, and there are for nursing also, but there are also 4 year programs for both. I would do a 4 year for either.
Reply:Vet Tech is definitely intense. I am doing it right now. But you can be an assistant I do believe without any school. I suggest doing 3 year vet tech. I am doing 2 year right now, and I feel I would benefit more from a couple more semesters. Do alot of research for both before getting into either.
Reply:A vet "assistant" probably doesn't require a degree--a registered vet tech is a two year program (associates degree).
To be a registered people nurse (RN) requires two years for an associates degree OR 2-3 years in a hospital diploma program OR 4 years for a bachelor's degree.
You can be an LPN (licensed practical nurse?) in even less time, maybe around a year, though they get paid less.
People nurses definitely get paid more than vet techs and are probably in higher demand.
Neither one is better than the other, it just depends on what you want to do with your life. Good luck!
Reply:I'm a senior year nursing student. RN's (registered nurses) make tons more than Vet Techs. There is a huge shortage of nurses now, so you will easily get a great job. You need to take your science prereqs to get into nursing school, and if you get an associates degree it takes 2 years, if you get a bachelors degree it will take 4 years. New grads can make $68,000 straight out of school in NYC! Plus it's a very rewarding feeling helping people. If you are a vet tech you may have to help put animals to sleep. :(
Reply:Not to sure theres probably a minimum number of years but the more the better..
What do YOU think is better?
Do you like people or dogs more?
Which gets paid better?
and how many eyars do i have to be in college for a people nurse and a vet nurse?
which do you think is better?
Nurse or Vet Nurse?
1) Should i become a vet nurse/assistant or a people nurse? Only you can answer this question for yourself since this is what you will be doing for a living. It really comes down to whether you rather deal with humans or pets.
2) Which gets paid better?
Human nurse! Hands down!
3) and how many eyars do i have to be in college for a people nurse and a vet nurse?
Human nurses can graduate in 4-5 years. Veterinarian technicians sometimes have no schooling, sometimes have a 2 year degree, and sometimes have a 4+ year degree. Greatly depends on your location and the vet office that hires you.
4) which do you think is better?
I am not the best person to ask this question to because I am biased! I absolutely LOVE what I do. I sometimes think I need to be pinched at work because I love my job that much. Like all professions, there are good days and there are bad days. My passion is animals, so this is the perfect career for me.
Reply:People nurses get paid a LOT better in most all cases. BUT, more exposure to diseases that YOU can get!!!!!!!
And personally, I like sticking animals with needles a lot more than I would like sticking people with them!!!!
There MAY still be some two year schools for Vet Tech, and there are for nursing also, but there are also 4 year programs for both. I would do a 4 year for either.
Reply:Vet Tech is definitely intense. I am doing it right now. But you can be an assistant I do believe without any school. I suggest doing 3 year vet tech. I am doing 2 year right now, and I feel I would benefit more from a couple more semesters. Do alot of research for both before getting into either.
Reply:A vet "assistant" probably doesn't require a degree--a registered vet tech is a two year program (associates degree).
To be a registered people nurse (RN) requires two years for an associates degree OR 2-3 years in a hospital diploma program OR 4 years for a bachelor's degree.
You can be an LPN (licensed practical nurse?) in even less time, maybe around a year, though they get paid less.
People nurses definitely get paid more than vet techs and are probably in higher demand.
Neither one is better than the other, it just depends on what you want to do with your life. Good luck!
Reply:I'm a senior year nursing student. RN's (registered nurses) make tons more than Vet Techs. There is a huge shortage of nurses now, so you will easily get a great job. You need to take your science prereqs to get into nursing school, and if you get an associates degree it takes 2 years, if you get a bachelors degree it will take 4 years. New grads can make $68,000 straight out of school in NYC! Plus it's a very rewarding feeling helping people. If you are a vet tech you may have to help put animals to sleep. :(
Reply:Not to sure theres probably a minimum number of years but the more the better..
What do YOU think is better?
Do you like people or dogs more?
Dinosaurs prove God doesn't exist?
If dinosaurs roamed the earth millions of years ago... but yet Christians told me the world was created 4000 eyars before Jesus, then isn't that prove the bible is all one big LIE. Even if Jesus existed he was just crazy, or a liar?
Dinosaurs prove God doesn't exist?
Given the genealogies of the Bible, it’s safe to assume that the world along with Adam and Eve and the dinosaurs was created less than 10,000 years ago.
OK, is there evidence of younger dates for dinosaur fossils? Oh yeah (these are easy to look up).
In 1981, scientists identified unfossilized dinosaur bones which had been found in Alaska 20 years earlier. Dr. Philip Currie (an evolutionist) wrote about this and some similar finds, “An even more spectacular example was found on the North Shore of Alaska, where many thousands of bones lack any significant degree of permineralization. The bones look and feel like old cow bones, and the discoverers of the site did not report it for twenty years because they assumed they were bison, not dinosaur, bones.”
As Dr. Margaret Helder has said, “How these bones could have remained in fresh condition for 70 million years is a perplexing question. One thing is certain: they were not preserved by cold. Everyone recognizes that the climate in these regions was much warmer during the time when the dinosaurs lived.”
In 1990 a sample of various dinosaur bones were sent to the University of Arizona for a “blind” Carbon-14 dating procedure. “Blind” in the sense that they didn’t tell them what the bones were. The oldest date they got was 16 thousand years. Now I don’t think they are even that old, but that’s a far cry from the millions of years evolutionists suggest. If dinosaurs became extinct more than 65 million years ago, there should be no carbon-14 left in their bones. Evolutionist of course say the samples must have been contaminated.
In 1990, Scientists from the University of Montana found T. rex bones that were not totally fossilized and even found what appeared to be blood cells in them. Dr. Mary Schweitzer said, “It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn’t believe it. … The bones, after all, are 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?” How indeed?
And then in 2005, they found an even greater discovery. Science Daily website said (March 25, 2005): “Dr. Mary Schweitzer . . . has succeeded in isolating soft tissue from the femur of a 68-million-year-old dinosaur. Not only is the tissue largely intact, it’s still transparent and pliable, and microscopic interior structures resembling blood vessels and even cells are still present.”
As Dr. David Menton said, “It certainly taxes one’s imagination to believe that soft tissue and cells could remain so relatively fresh in appearance for the tens of millions of years of supposed evolutionary history.” Wouldn’t that be a hit for the meat industry if we could figure out how to preserve meat for so long?
This evidence fits much better with Noah’s flood 4-5 thousand years ago, and a recent extinction of dinosaurs.
So, where are all the human fossils with dinosaurs? Actually, where are all the human fossils with any animals? Human fossils are extremely rare, and that’s what you would expect since they would have survived the longest in the Flood.
As Dr. Jonathon Sarfati said, “The more intelligent creatures would find a way to escape until the very end, leaving their bodies nearer the surface, where post-Flood erosion would destroy most evidence of their existence. Humans would have been most resilient of all, clinging to debris and rafts, before they died of exposure...”
With this line of reasoning, you can’t prove that man and Dodo birds lived together since their fossils are not found together. If human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren’t buried together. It is pretty unlikely that humans and dinosaurs would live together for the most part (Would you choose to live near a large carnivorous dinosaur?).
Another thing you have to realize is that 95% of all fossils are marine organisms and 95% of that remaining 5% were plants. The percentage of the remaining animals is extremely small. So, we should not expect to find many human fossils at all, and we don’t.
Besides, the evidence from the jumbled up bone fragments can easily be misinterpreted. They have confused a dolphin’s rib for a human collarbone and an extinct pig’s tooth for a human tooth before. Couldn’t they make similar mistakes concerning human and dinosaur fossils? Especially since they are looking at the evidence from an evolutionary paradigm. Given the amount of sedimentary rock, we still have a great deal more to explore. There is still the possibility of finding human fossils in the lower levels of Flood sediment and along with dinosaurs.
And actually, more than once, there have been fossilized human footprints found along with dinosaur footprints. As you know, the evolutionists just quickly dismiss the evidence or try to get it discredited. They have to—it doesn’t fit their paradigm.
In a copper mine in Moab, Utah, two human skeletons were found in Cretaceous sandstone (supposedly more than 65 million years old, back in the time of the dinosaurs). So what did they say? They must have fallen down to that level somehow or were recently buried there.
In 2005, there was an interesting report by the Associated Press: “Villagers digging in China’s rich fossil beds have uncovered the preserved remains of a tiny dinosaur in the belly of a mammal, a startling discovery for scientists who have long believed early mammals couldn’t possibly attack and eat a dinosaur.” It was a dog type of creature. Evolutionists had previously said that no advanced mammals lived during the time of the dinosaurs. But, the more we dig, the more this kind of stuff is found.
For decades, evolutionists taught that coelacanths (a type of fish) became extinct about the same time as the dinosaurs (65 million years ago). Because its fossils looked “prehistoric” and because of its large fins, scientists speculated that the large fins evolved into feet and that its descendants eventually walked out of the sea. That’s until Dec. 24, 1938 when a five foot long coelacanth was caught off the coast of S. Africa. Since then, over 100 of them have been caught and researchers have found that Indonesian fisherman had been selling coelacanths in their fish markets for years. Guess what, the coelacanths are still using their fins to swim, not walk. No fossils of coelacanths have ever been found in the same layers as human fossils, but they have been found in the same layers as dinosaur fossils—yet we know coelacanths and humans lived together, because they do today.
In 1994, the Wollemi pine tree was found in Australia (also said to have become extinct millions of years ago). Professor Carrick Chambers said, “The discovery is the equivalent of finding a small dinosaur still alive on Earth.” Before these were found, if you would have said, “I believe that coelacanths and humans or the wollemi pine tree and humans lived together,” they would have said you were nuts. Just because we don’t find fossils of certain creatures or plants together with humans in the fossil record, it doesn’t mean they didn’t live together.
Reply:people who think the earth was created 4000 yrs ago, havent read the bible.
number 1..it states in the bible ' one day is LIKE a thousand years to the lord'
number 2..the bible says 'god created the animals BEFORE he created man'
number 3..the bible is NOT science book and was NEVER intended to be..it is a book on examples of god..OT HOW GOD CAN BE..NT HOW MUCH GOD LOVES US AND WHAT JESUS DID FOR US
Reply:Jesus never said those, it was some stupid dummys who made up stuff that are wrong.
Reply:Some christians think that God put dino bones in the ground at the same time He made everything else, just because he could. But I think that if God existed, he wouldn't put false clues somewhere just to confuse people.
Reply:I think your the crazy one. Jesus did exist and was not able to lie nor crazy and the Bible is true. I don't care about dinosaurs.
Reply:Dinosaurs and men existed together .The Incas made pictographs of men and dinosaurs together thousands of years ago.(See Ica Stones ,not Inca stones on Yahoo search)
Job chapter 40 speaks of a dinosaur called Behemoth .He is huge ,eats grass,stands in the rushing river and is not moved,has ribs like iron and a tail like a cedar tree.Now Crocs don't eat grass,and elephants and Hippos have teeny little tails.What he was describing was a brontosaurus type .
Jesus was indeed ,either one who thought himself to be a hard boiled egg,a liar of the worst degree,or Lord and Savior.I choose Lord and Savior.He did exist ,first century historian Flavius Josephus says so in his book 'Antiqueties' and he was not a Christian man.
Reply:Can't you people make an effort to at least be original? B O R R I N G!!!
The Bible does not refute the existence of dinosauers any more than it refutes the existence of Eskimos. We know Jesus existed because the Romans, for one, had Him down in their records. All time frames in the Bible are inexact. Probably so snarky little village atheists like yourself would have something to obsess about ad nauseum.
Reply:The Bible doesn't focus how old the earth is, rather, it teaches about the spiritual aspect of reality, namely that God is the creator and our Father. God bless.
Reply:the people who wrote the boble were morons
just forget about it
Reply:No.
It indicates that the 'Christians' that told you that was inaccurately informed themself then and there possibly.
Reply:Free your mind. Then, you will understand.
Reply:Seems so.
Reply:that and hundreds of other such examples
Reply:Your statements are so pathetic!!!
Oh yes, lets base all our facts on science and man, shall we? Of course scientists know more than God Himself, so they couldn't be wrong, could they?
Geeez!!!! The earth has NEVER been proven to be billions of years old, and dinosaurs are not millions of years old. They walked the earth with man. You are very sadly misled, like the rest of the evolutionists.
The only BIG LIE here is the one satan deceived you into believing that the world is so old, because it has to fit his agenda!
Reply:Because of Dinosaurs, we know the World has been around longer than 6000 years. Who knows exactly, but understand there is absolutely NO solid scientific evidence proving that humans did not exist with dinosaurs, and exist from the beginning. There are also references to Dinosaur like creatures in the Bible, suggesting that humans in fact do exist along side dinosaurs in the beginning. Jesus also did exist and his teachings were TRUE. whether you are willing to accept that is up to you. God Bless
Reply:Some biblical scholars will still maintain that dinosaurs and people co-existed and science is wrong about how old those bones are. I don't know about that, but the Bible could be proved to be written by human beings (which is likely) and be a complete fabrication, but doesn't disprove the existence of a superior being.
Reply:Simple, at least one of those time tables is wrong.
If the Bible is correct, then dinosaurs coexisted with humans. If there were evidence that any humans ever saw a dinosaur, then the Bible would be true and the time table with millions of years is false.
Well, such evidence does exist!
For example, there are many examples of art left by ancient civilizations that show dinosaurs!
In the Grand Canyon and in Natural Bridges National Park (USA) there are petroglyphs (rock etchings) that show dinosaurs.
In Mexico, there were found many, many clay dinosaur figurines.
In Peru, there are ancient Inca burial stones that show many known dinosaurs.
In Cambodia, there is a base relief sculpture of a dinosaur.
These examples of art left behind by ancient men show many known dinosaurs. This art, however was formed hundreds of years before these dinosaurs were "discovered".
Much of this art is done in great detail! If these are not dinosaurs, then what are they and why do they look so much like known dinosaurs?
If they are dinosaurs, and I don't know what else they could be, then either these men had seen them, or someone else who had seen them told the artist what they looked like!
See the photos at the attached links and judge for yourself! Examine the evidence!
Reply:Who says dinosaurs roamed the earth millions of years ago. Charles Darwin pulled that idea out of his butt and there is still no scientific proof to back up his ideas. The earth is only 6 to 8 thousand years old. And yes i'll probably get fifty million thumbs downs but I swear no one on here can give me Scientific proof that the earth is even 20,000 years old. I'll ask that question right know and you can see that there is no proof for the evolution crap that gets taught in public schools.
Reply:Behemoth accounted for the thousands of dinosaurs that existed between 65 mya and 220 mya obviously!
Have you not read the Bible?!
There's a tiny blip about a monster with a navel..oh **** dinos don't have navels....
Reply:Well, intelligent design says that 4000 years isn't really 4000 years... it's more like, some parts of time go really fast, some parts go super slow.. even millions of years slow.
it has to do with the primitive scope of time that the ancient tribes of jerusalem could percieve. years were long, thousands were liek omg for-evah! and thus a thousand years could really be 12 trillion years.
but to be quite honest, it's a really big stretch of the imagination, considering how stalwart the church has been in the last two thousand years in forcing the belief that the world is only 4000 years old.
i think religion is more about finding comfort and patterns in the universe and your scope of it than in saying "i'm right all the time" and it's great for people to feel that, especially in times of need. think about the social, psychological, spiritual and emotional things christianity can do for you instead of simply saying this is right, this is wrong, ha ha im so smart.
Reply:God created all the animal,s then but did not mention each one,,the hippo,the cat, the horse,the rat ect..is not in it but they are real,,doesn,t prove a thing..try again.
Dinosaurs prove God doesn't exist?
Given the genealogies of the Bible, it’s safe to assume that the world along with Adam and Eve and the dinosaurs was created less than 10,000 years ago.
OK, is there evidence of younger dates for dinosaur fossils? Oh yeah (these are easy to look up).
In 1981, scientists identified unfossilized dinosaur bones which had been found in Alaska 20 years earlier. Dr. Philip Currie (an evolutionist) wrote about this and some similar finds, “An even more spectacular example was found on the North Shore of Alaska, where many thousands of bones lack any significant degree of permineralization. The bones look and feel like old cow bones, and the discoverers of the site did not report it for twenty years because they assumed they were bison, not dinosaur, bones.”
As Dr. Margaret Helder has said, “How these bones could have remained in fresh condition for 70 million years is a perplexing question. One thing is certain: they were not preserved by cold. Everyone recognizes that the climate in these regions was much warmer during the time when the dinosaurs lived.”
In 1990 a sample of various dinosaur bones were sent to the University of Arizona for a “blind” Carbon-14 dating procedure. “Blind” in the sense that they didn’t tell them what the bones were. The oldest date they got was 16 thousand years. Now I don’t think they are even that old, but that’s a far cry from the millions of years evolutionists suggest. If dinosaurs became extinct more than 65 million years ago, there should be no carbon-14 left in their bones. Evolutionist of course say the samples must have been contaminated.
In 1990, Scientists from the University of Montana found T. rex bones that were not totally fossilized and even found what appeared to be blood cells in them. Dr. Mary Schweitzer said, “It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn’t believe it. … The bones, after all, are 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?” How indeed?
And then in 2005, they found an even greater discovery. Science Daily website said (March 25, 2005): “Dr. Mary Schweitzer . . . has succeeded in isolating soft tissue from the femur of a 68-million-year-old dinosaur. Not only is the tissue largely intact, it’s still transparent and pliable, and microscopic interior structures resembling blood vessels and even cells are still present.”
As Dr. David Menton said, “It certainly taxes one’s imagination to believe that soft tissue and cells could remain so relatively fresh in appearance for the tens of millions of years of supposed evolutionary history.” Wouldn’t that be a hit for the meat industry if we could figure out how to preserve meat for so long?
This evidence fits much better with Noah’s flood 4-5 thousand years ago, and a recent extinction of dinosaurs.
So, where are all the human fossils with dinosaurs? Actually, where are all the human fossils with any animals? Human fossils are extremely rare, and that’s what you would expect since they would have survived the longest in the Flood.
As Dr. Jonathon Sarfati said, “The more intelligent creatures would find a way to escape until the very end, leaving their bodies nearer the surface, where post-Flood erosion would destroy most evidence of their existence. Humans would have been most resilient of all, clinging to debris and rafts, before they died of exposure...”
With this line of reasoning, you can’t prove that man and Dodo birds lived together since their fossils are not found together. If human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren’t buried together. It is pretty unlikely that humans and dinosaurs would live together for the most part (Would you choose to live near a large carnivorous dinosaur?).
Another thing you have to realize is that 95% of all fossils are marine organisms and 95% of that remaining 5% were plants. The percentage of the remaining animals is extremely small. So, we should not expect to find many human fossils at all, and we don’t.
Besides, the evidence from the jumbled up bone fragments can easily be misinterpreted. They have confused a dolphin’s rib for a human collarbone and an extinct pig’s tooth for a human tooth before. Couldn’t they make similar mistakes concerning human and dinosaur fossils? Especially since they are looking at the evidence from an evolutionary paradigm. Given the amount of sedimentary rock, we still have a great deal more to explore. There is still the possibility of finding human fossils in the lower levels of Flood sediment and along with dinosaurs.
And actually, more than once, there have been fossilized human footprints found along with dinosaur footprints. As you know, the evolutionists just quickly dismiss the evidence or try to get it discredited. They have to—it doesn’t fit their paradigm.
In a copper mine in Moab, Utah, two human skeletons were found in Cretaceous sandstone (supposedly more than 65 million years old, back in the time of the dinosaurs). So what did they say? They must have fallen down to that level somehow or were recently buried there.
In 2005, there was an interesting report by the Associated Press: “Villagers digging in China’s rich fossil beds have uncovered the preserved remains of a tiny dinosaur in the belly of a mammal, a startling discovery for scientists who have long believed early mammals couldn’t possibly attack and eat a dinosaur.” It was a dog type of creature. Evolutionists had previously said that no advanced mammals lived during the time of the dinosaurs. But, the more we dig, the more this kind of stuff is found.
For decades, evolutionists taught that coelacanths (a type of fish) became extinct about the same time as the dinosaurs (65 million years ago). Because its fossils looked “prehistoric” and because of its large fins, scientists speculated that the large fins evolved into feet and that its descendants eventually walked out of the sea. That’s until Dec. 24, 1938 when a five foot long coelacanth was caught off the coast of S. Africa. Since then, over 100 of them have been caught and researchers have found that Indonesian fisherman had been selling coelacanths in their fish markets for years. Guess what, the coelacanths are still using their fins to swim, not walk. No fossils of coelacanths have ever been found in the same layers as human fossils, but they have been found in the same layers as dinosaur fossils—yet we know coelacanths and humans lived together, because they do today.
In 1994, the Wollemi pine tree was found in Australia (also said to have become extinct millions of years ago). Professor Carrick Chambers said, “The discovery is the equivalent of finding a small dinosaur still alive on Earth.” Before these were found, if you would have said, “I believe that coelacanths and humans or the wollemi pine tree and humans lived together,” they would have said you were nuts. Just because we don’t find fossils of certain creatures or plants together with humans in the fossil record, it doesn’t mean they didn’t live together.
Reply:people who think the earth was created 4000 yrs ago, havent read the bible.
number 1..it states in the bible ' one day is LIKE a thousand years to the lord'
number 2..the bible says 'god created the animals BEFORE he created man'
number 3..the bible is NOT science book and was NEVER intended to be..it is a book on examples of god..OT HOW GOD CAN BE..NT HOW MUCH GOD LOVES US AND WHAT JESUS DID FOR US
Reply:Jesus never said those, it was some stupid dummys who made up stuff that are wrong.
Reply:Some christians think that God put dino bones in the ground at the same time He made everything else, just because he could. But I think that if God existed, he wouldn't put false clues somewhere just to confuse people.
Reply:I think your the crazy one. Jesus did exist and was not able to lie nor crazy and the Bible is true. I don't care about dinosaurs.
Reply:Dinosaurs and men existed together .The Incas made pictographs of men and dinosaurs together thousands of years ago.(See Ica Stones ,not Inca stones on Yahoo search)
Job chapter 40 speaks of a dinosaur called Behemoth .He is huge ,eats grass,stands in the rushing river and is not moved,has ribs like iron and a tail like a cedar tree.Now Crocs don't eat grass,and elephants and Hippos have teeny little tails.What he was describing was a brontosaurus type .
Jesus was indeed ,either one who thought himself to be a hard boiled egg,a liar of the worst degree,or Lord and Savior.I choose Lord and Savior.He did exist ,first century historian Flavius Josephus says so in his book 'Antiqueties' and he was not a Christian man.
Reply:Can't you people make an effort to at least be original? B O R R I N G!!!
The Bible does not refute the existence of dinosauers any more than it refutes the existence of Eskimos. We know Jesus existed because the Romans, for one, had Him down in their records. All time frames in the Bible are inexact. Probably so snarky little village atheists like yourself would have something to obsess about ad nauseum.
Reply:The Bible doesn't focus how old the earth is, rather, it teaches about the spiritual aspect of reality, namely that God is the creator and our Father. God bless.
Reply:the people who wrote the boble were morons
just forget about it
Reply:No.
It indicates that the 'Christians' that told you that was inaccurately informed themself then and there possibly.
Reply:Free your mind. Then, you will understand.
Reply:Seems so.
Reply:that and hundreds of other such examples
Reply:Your statements are so pathetic!!!
Oh yes, lets base all our facts on science and man, shall we? Of course scientists know more than God Himself, so they couldn't be wrong, could they?
Geeez!!!! The earth has NEVER been proven to be billions of years old, and dinosaurs are not millions of years old. They walked the earth with man. You are very sadly misled, like the rest of the evolutionists.
The only BIG LIE here is the one satan deceived you into believing that the world is so old, because it has to fit his agenda!
Reply:Because of Dinosaurs, we know the World has been around longer than 6000 years. Who knows exactly, but understand there is absolutely NO solid scientific evidence proving that humans did not exist with dinosaurs, and exist from the beginning. There are also references to Dinosaur like creatures in the Bible, suggesting that humans in fact do exist along side dinosaurs in the beginning. Jesus also did exist and his teachings were TRUE. whether you are willing to accept that is up to you. God Bless
Reply:Some biblical scholars will still maintain that dinosaurs and people co-existed and science is wrong about how old those bones are. I don't know about that, but the Bible could be proved to be written by human beings (which is likely) and be a complete fabrication, but doesn't disprove the existence of a superior being.
Reply:Simple, at least one of those time tables is wrong.
If the Bible is correct, then dinosaurs coexisted with humans. If there were evidence that any humans ever saw a dinosaur, then the Bible would be true and the time table with millions of years is false.
Well, such evidence does exist!
For example, there are many examples of art left by ancient civilizations that show dinosaurs!
In the Grand Canyon and in Natural Bridges National Park (USA) there are petroglyphs (rock etchings) that show dinosaurs.
In Mexico, there were found many, many clay dinosaur figurines.
In Peru, there are ancient Inca burial stones that show many known dinosaurs.
In Cambodia, there is a base relief sculpture of a dinosaur.
These examples of art left behind by ancient men show many known dinosaurs. This art, however was formed hundreds of years before these dinosaurs were "discovered".
Much of this art is done in great detail! If these are not dinosaurs, then what are they and why do they look so much like known dinosaurs?
If they are dinosaurs, and I don't know what else they could be, then either these men had seen them, or someone else who had seen them told the artist what they looked like!
See the photos at the attached links and judge for yourself! Examine the evidence!
Reply:Who says dinosaurs roamed the earth millions of years ago. Charles Darwin pulled that idea out of his butt and there is still no scientific proof to back up his ideas. The earth is only 6 to 8 thousand years old. And yes i'll probably get fifty million thumbs downs but I swear no one on here can give me Scientific proof that the earth is even 20,000 years old. I'll ask that question right know and you can see that there is no proof for the evolution crap that gets taught in public schools.
Reply:Behemoth accounted for the thousands of dinosaurs that existed between 65 mya and 220 mya obviously!
Have you not read the Bible?!
There's a tiny blip about a monster with a navel..oh **** dinos don't have navels....
Reply:Well, intelligent design says that 4000 years isn't really 4000 years... it's more like, some parts of time go really fast, some parts go super slow.. even millions of years slow.
it has to do with the primitive scope of time that the ancient tribes of jerusalem could percieve. years were long, thousands were liek omg for-evah! and thus a thousand years could really be 12 trillion years.
but to be quite honest, it's a really big stretch of the imagination, considering how stalwart the church has been in the last two thousand years in forcing the belief that the world is only 4000 years old.
i think religion is more about finding comfort and patterns in the universe and your scope of it than in saying "i'm right all the time" and it's great for people to feel that, especially in times of need. think about the social, psychological, spiritual and emotional things christianity can do for you instead of simply saying this is right, this is wrong, ha ha im so smart.
Reply:God created all the animal,s then but did not mention each one,,the hippo,the cat, the horse,the rat ect..is not in it but they are real,,doesn,t prove a thing..try again.
I am a guy and I have lost a bet and I have to go in victoria secret n buy panties what should I expect in VS?
I am 15 eyars old and I lost a bet to my sister. I have to go in there and buy panties. If a worker asks me if these are for my girlfriend I have to say no and I am straight. I also have to try on a pair. I am really freaked out and scared because I do not know what to expect. Please help me out
I am a guy and I have lost a bet and I have to go in victoria secret n buy panties what should I expect in VS?
tell the sales lady you need panties in your size and need to try them on. if questioned which i doubt simply tell her you need them for your sister as a gift she only wears boys tighti whities and you are trying to get her to be a girl. turn it into embarassment for your sister. that'll teach her
Reply:What do you think you'll expect?
The manager or the supervisor will most likely ask you to leave and lecture you to stop your silly, "I don't care
about the world I only care about myself"-attitude. Worse case scenario, they'd call security and the security guards will write you up for a mischievous conduct and ban you from the mall and more serious charges can follow like trespassing.
You have the choice to tell you sister you're just not going to do it and that you respect the rest of the people in the world to not put them in a position to have to lecture you, or for you to put yourself down like that...who do you need to prove your defiance of the rules to?
I think it's an impossible task and you should ask for a rematch, best 2 out of 3.
Reply:Do the terms of the bet include not bringing a female friend in with you? ;)
Reply:I think you can expect the staff to be polite and understanding. Especially if you tell them what you have told us. The fact that you are 15 is a good thing. If you were 30 or older, they might think you were a bit strange. I think I would go in and ask for the manager, and tell her the situation. Do not try to make up some story. If you were buying underwear for your sister, they would expect that she would have already told you her size, and what style to buy, etc. By telling them the truth, it will put them on your side, and they will help you kill a half-hour.
Otherwise you will look suspicious and uncomfortable.
Finally, do not expect to see half-naked women trying on bras and panties. It ain't gonna happen. They will have places for men to sit. About the trying on part, I believe you have to buy them first. if you try on underwear they can't sell them to anyone else, right? So bring around $20. If you are honest, it will work out fine.
Reply:well that sux for u...if i were u go to the PinK section (not tha sexy lingerie stuff)...it'll be more young gurrl stuff and u can play it off as if u had to get something for your sister...now for the trying on...well thats just funny...
Reply:omg what was the bet wow u will exspect 2 see girls and if u cant say there for ur gf say there for ur mom or sister or something just dont buy a thong lol
Reply:haha.
They arent going to let you try them on since you are male..this would be very rare for them to let you go into the fitting rooms.
although killing half an hour in victorias secret..easy...go to the fragrance section and test out all the scents, they have cologne for men also
it wont be awkward being there,the store is big anyway.
eh, pick out something nice for your mom or a girl you know..or just experiment to find out which one smells nice that will make the time go by fast , good luck =)
Reply:Unless you try them out in the open, you might get to escape the trying on part because they do not allow males in the changing rooms.
Reply:look i am guy and i have bought bra and panties , they dont care for them its a sale
Reply:No one is going to ask you if they are for your girlfriend. No one is going to care. People there just mind their own business. You don't need to be afraid.
Reply:There was never any bet; you are yet another one of these guys who fanatsaize about doing this stuff. Please, enough already.
Reply:expect thongs and silk
Reply:oh no well guys go in all the time my ex used to shop in there with me. I see guys there.... its the trying things on that I don't know what to say.... sorry best of luck!!
I am a guy and I have lost a bet and I have to go in victoria secret n buy panties what should I expect in VS?
tell the sales lady you need panties in your size and need to try them on. if questioned which i doubt simply tell her you need them for your sister as a gift she only wears boys tighti whities and you are trying to get her to be a girl. turn it into embarassment for your sister. that'll teach her
Reply:What do you think you'll expect?
The manager or the supervisor will most likely ask you to leave and lecture you to stop your silly, "I don't care
about the world I only care about myself"-attitude. Worse case scenario, they'd call security and the security guards will write you up for a mischievous conduct and ban you from the mall and more serious charges can follow like trespassing.
You have the choice to tell you sister you're just not going to do it and that you respect the rest of the people in the world to not put them in a position to have to lecture you, or for you to put yourself down like that...who do you need to prove your defiance of the rules to?
I think it's an impossible task and you should ask for a rematch, best 2 out of 3.
Reply:Do the terms of the bet include not bringing a female friend in with you? ;)
Reply:I think you can expect the staff to be polite and understanding. Especially if you tell them what you have told us. The fact that you are 15 is a good thing. If you were 30 or older, they might think you were a bit strange. I think I would go in and ask for the manager, and tell her the situation. Do not try to make up some story. If you were buying underwear for your sister, they would expect that she would have already told you her size, and what style to buy, etc. By telling them the truth, it will put them on your side, and they will help you kill a half-hour.
Otherwise you will look suspicious and uncomfortable.
Finally, do not expect to see half-naked women trying on bras and panties. It ain't gonna happen. They will have places for men to sit. About the trying on part, I believe you have to buy them first. if you try on underwear they can't sell them to anyone else, right? So bring around $20. If you are honest, it will work out fine.
Reply:well that sux for u...if i were u go to the PinK section (not tha sexy lingerie stuff)...it'll be more young gurrl stuff and u can play it off as if u had to get something for your sister...now for the trying on...well thats just funny...
Reply:omg what was the bet wow u will exspect 2 see girls and if u cant say there for ur gf say there for ur mom or sister or something just dont buy a thong lol
Reply:haha.
They arent going to let you try them on since you are male..this would be very rare for them to let you go into the fitting rooms.
although killing half an hour in victorias secret..easy...go to the fragrance section and test out all the scents, they have cologne for men also
it wont be awkward being there,the store is big anyway.
eh, pick out something nice for your mom or a girl you know..or just experiment to find out which one smells nice that will make the time go by fast , good luck =)
Reply:Unless you try them out in the open, you might get to escape the trying on part because they do not allow males in the changing rooms.
Reply:look i am guy and i have bought bra and panties , they dont care for them its a sale
Reply:No one is going to ask you if they are for your girlfriend. No one is going to care. People there just mind their own business. You don't need to be afraid.
Reply:There was never any bet; you are yet another one of these guys who fanatsaize about doing this stuff. Please, enough already.
Reply:expect thongs and silk
Reply:oh no well guys go in all the time my ex used to shop in there with me. I see guys there.... its the trying things on that I don't know what to say.... sorry best of luck!!
Is there a way to get a letter to an Army soldier overseas when you don't know what base they are at?
My best friend and a person I love very much was deployed last month. Called out of inactive ready reserve with only 3 days warning, he barely had time to even call me and had no idea where they were really sending him, but it had something to do with Iraq and Iran. I know he can't call or check email, and I would really like to write him letters so he knows I'm thinking about him. Even if they don't get to him for months, it would make me feel better to be able to send them. It was really a shock, being that he wasn't active for over 6 years, is 36 and served in the first Gulf War... I haven't seen him in over 2 eyars and now I worry that I may never get to again. This is the first person I know to go overseas so I had no idea how hard it is.
Does anyone know a way to get letters to deployed Army personel when you don't have a base address? I would really appreciate anyone that has any ideas.
Is there a way to get a letter to an Army soldier overseas when you don't know what base they are at?
You actually wouldn't be writing to a base over there. Just to an FPO-AE address. Probably the only way, unless you know his family, is if he writes you first. The military is pretty strict about giving out that kind of information. They protect them. My husband can't even tell me over the phone or on the computer where he's at, or what dates he's coming home. And letters don't take nearly that long to get to them!! I send my husband packages, and they take less than a week to arrive.
If you manage to get his address, I would recommend setting up an account on www.motomail.us. You can type out letters to him on there. They get printed up and delivered to him within 24-48 hours. I've found it to be the quickest way to get my husband a message. I send him my work schedule every week that way so he'll know the best times to contact me. Though he's in Iraq, we chit chat on instant messenger all the time and use a web cam so we can see each other.
Good Luck!
Reply:sorry with out the address to him , theres no way to send him any thing...just keep writing letters and save them so you can give to him later....i have boyfriend over seas right now and i uderstand that those letters are inportant....he will call you and dont for get to ask him for the address
Reply:Contact your congressperson...they have a staff that is specifically employed to answer such questions.
PS Service personnel do have access to email...so if you can email him...you're golden.
Reply:If you have his full name, rank, social security number, and branch of service the American Red Cross can find out a mailing address for the unit he is deployed with. If you have the name of the unit he is deployed with it becomes even easier. His parents/relatives should have those tidbits of information.
Reply:I'm going to take a WILD stab. I he's your BEST FRIEND, then you should know his parents. ASK THEM.
If he's your BEST FRIEND, why haven't you seen him in OVER 2 YEARS?
Reply:The more information you have the better the chances that you can locate him. If you know his local unit, call them and ask for a mailing address. Or just try a local reserve unit. If you have his social security number, your chances of success are even greater.
Don't count out email. If he was mobilized last month, he may still be at a mobilization station here in the U.S. and may have access. Additionally, many of the FOBs in Iraq and the bases in Afghanistan have internet cafes, so he may have greater access than you think.
Good luck.
impacted wisdom teeth
Does anyone know a way to get letters to deployed Army personel when you don't have a base address? I would really appreciate anyone that has any ideas.
Is there a way to get a letter to an Army soldier overseas when you don't know what base they are at?
You actually wouldn't be writing to a base over there. Just to an FPO-AE address. Probably the only way, unless you know his family, is if he writes you first. The military is pretty strict about giving out that kind of information. They protect them. My husband can't even tell me over the phone or on the computer where he's at, or what dates he's coming home. And letters don't take nearly that long to get to them!! I send my husband packages, and they take less than a week to arrive.
If you manage to get his address, I would recommend setting up an account on www.motomail.us. You can type out letters to him on there. They get printed up and delivered to him within 24-48 hours. I've found it to be the quickest way to get my husband a message. I send him my work schedule every week that way so he'll know the best times to contact me. Though he's in Iraq, we chit chat on instant messenger all the time and use a web cam so we can see each other.
Good Luck!
Reply:sorry with out the address to him , theres no way to send him any thing...just keep writing letters and save them so you can give to him later....i have boyfriend over seas right now and i uderstand that those letters are inportant....he will call you and dont for get to ask him for the address
Reply:Contact your congressperson...they have a staff that is specifically employed to answer such questions.
PS Service personnel do have access to email...so if you can email him...you're golden.
Reply:If you have his full name, rank, social security number, and branch of service the American Red Cross can find out a mailing address for the unit he is deployed with. If you have the name of the unit he is deployed with it becomes even easier. His parents/relatives should have those tidbits of information.
Reply:I'm going to take a WILD stab. I he's your BEST FRIEND, then you should know his parents. ASK THEM.
If he's your BEST FRIEND, why haven't you seen him in OVER 2 YEARS?
Reply:The more information you have the better the chances that you can locate him. If you know his local unit, call them and ask for a mailing address. Or just try a local reserve unit. If you have his social security number, your chances of success are even greater.
Don't count out email. If he was mobilized last month, he may still be at a mobilization station here in the U.S. and may have access. Additionally, many of the FOBs in Iraq and the bases in Afghanistan have internet cafes, so he may have greater access than you think.
Good luck.
impacted wisdom teeth
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)